Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Reproductive Rights results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,663 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Reproductive Rights is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Center for Reproductive Rights
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos