Speaker summary
73% 2 analyzed articles/videos 407.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Constitutional Rights results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 73.8% saturation with 419 hits . Analysis detected 2,783.951 faulty-reasoning hits from 407.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of 31% (19,596 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Constitutional Rights is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Center for Constitutional Rights
Speaker details
Total words: 407.667
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 19.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos407.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 73.8% 73.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 52.6% 52.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 40.0% 40.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 39.5% 39.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 50.4% 50.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 40.3% 40.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 29.2% 29.2% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 18.0% 18.0% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 73.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 52.6%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 40.3%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 40.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 6.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 19.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst