Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video49 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 49 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (712 of 28,364 speakers). This Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD)
Speaker details
Total words: 49
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos