Speaker summary
78% 3 analyzed articles/videos 166.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cenk Uygur results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 57.7% saturation with 81.398 hits . Analysis detected 429.701 faulty-reasoning hits from 166.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of 30% (19,955 of 28,364 speakers). This Cenk Uygur is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Cenk Uygur
Speaker details
Total words: 166.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.6% percentile 18.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos166.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 57.7% 57.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 29.8% 29.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 27.0% 27.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 27.0% 27.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 26.9% 26.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 20.2% 20.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 57.7%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 29.8%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst