Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cedar Rapids Economic Development Center results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 265 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,018 of 28,364 speakers). This Cedar Rapids Economic Development Center is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Cedar Rapids Economic Development Center
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos