Speaker summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecillia Wang results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61% saturation with 373.649 hits. Analysis detected 1,145.198 faulty-reasoning hits from 545 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,164 of 28,364 speakers). This Cecillia Wang is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Cecillia Wang
Speaker details
Total words: 545
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.8% percentile
8.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos545 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 61.0%61.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.3%10.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 61.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos