Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,454 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Stepansky results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 1,800 hits . Analysis detected 12,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,794 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,981 of 6,410 authors). This Joseph Stepansky is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group. Joseph Stepansky
Author details
Total words: 17,794
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst