Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video34.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ceci Maher results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (6,662 of 28,364 speakers). This Ceci Maher is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
Ceci Maher
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
62.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos