Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cecelia Dantas results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 149.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,977 of 28,326 speakers). This Cecelia Dantas is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Cecelia Dantas
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
60.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 80.8%80.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 59.6%59.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 30.8%30.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 80.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 59.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos