Speaker summary
⁠80%7 analyzed articles/videos108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CBC results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Recency Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 71.2% saturation with 76.891 hits. Analysis detected 142.891 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,101 of 28,364 speakers). This CBC is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
CBC
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 7
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
26.8% BS Score7 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 71.2%71.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 71.2%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos