Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Brian Goldman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 385 hits . Analysis detected 3,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,591 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 93% (519 of 6,628 authors). This Dr. Brian Goldman is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Dr. Brian Goldman
Author details
Total words: 1,591
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.2% percentile 8.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 15.9% 15.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.1% 20.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.0% 22.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 18.2% 18.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.9% 16.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 24.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 18.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 16.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 15.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.7%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst