Author summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Brian Goldman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 3,925 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,591 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 93% (519 of 6,628 authors). This Dr. Brian Goldman is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Dr. Brian Goldman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
93%Dr. Brian Goldman (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,591
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510092.2% percentile
8.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 15.9%15.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 20.1%20.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 22.0%22.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 18.2%18.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 16.9%16.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.5%5.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.2%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 22.0%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 18.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 16.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 16.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Author 15.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 14.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate