Speaker summary
73%2 analyzed articles/videos328.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherine Herridge results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 212 hits. Analysis detected 1,946.277 faulty-reasoning hits from 328.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of 22% (21,834 of 27,836 speakers). This Catherine Herridge is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Catherine Herridge
Speaker details
Total words: 328.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
14.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos328.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.6%19.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 29.9%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Composition/Division: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 0.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos