Speaker summary
⁠31%2 analyzed articles/videos101.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catalina Adorno results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 221 faulty-reasoning hits from 101.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (21,429 of 28,364 speakers). This Catalina Adorno is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group.
Catalina Adorno
Speaker details
Total words: 101.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.5% percentile
16.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos101.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 32.6%32.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.9%20.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 20.9%20.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 32.6%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 19.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 16.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos