Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cassandra Gomez results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.8% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 418.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 207 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,481 of 28,364 speakers). This Cassandra Gomez is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Cassandra Gomez
Speaker details
Total words: 207
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
21.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos207 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 23.2%23.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.8%26.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.8%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos