Speaker summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carroll’s attorneys results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Begging the Question as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,531 of 28,364 speakers). This Carroll’s attorneys is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Carroll’s attorneys
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Begging the Question: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos