Speaker summary
ā 40%2 analyzed articles/videos157.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Menjivar results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 55.8% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 237.718 faulty-reasoning hits from 157.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 36.4% and a BS Rank of ā 55% (12,812 of 28,364 speakers). This Caroline Menjivar is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Caroline Menjivar
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 55%Caroline Menjivar (selected)37%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 157.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
36.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos157.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 55.8%55.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.5%32.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.7%28.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 55.8%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos