Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Fitzgerald results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (920 of 42,608 speakers). This Caroline Fitzgerald is worse (more manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Caroline Fitzgerald
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠98%Caroline Fitzgerald (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 36
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510097.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos36 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos