Speaker summary
51%1 analyzed article/video86 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carlos Ramos results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 117.9 faulty-reasoning hits from 86 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,575 of 28,364 speakers). This Carlos Ramos is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Carlos Ramos
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 86
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos86 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.2%29.2%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.2%18.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 10.1%10.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.6%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos