Speaker summary
⁠69%2 analyzed articles/videos148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carl Ruby results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 383.903 faulty-reasoning hits from 148 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,456 of 28,364 speakers). This Carl Ruby is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Carl Ruby
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 148
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
21.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos148 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 67.3%67.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.8%31.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 67.3%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos