Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Szilagy results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 740 hits . Analysis detected 6,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,028 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of â 62% (2,529 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Szilagy is worse (more manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Sarah Szilagy
Author details
Total words: 6,028
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.9% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.4% 9.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst