Speaker summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos123.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cardinal Pietro Parolin results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Circular Reasoning and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.5% saturation with 108 hits. Analysis detected 188 faulty-reasoning hits from 123.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 43.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,080 of 28,364 speakers). This Cardinal Pietro Parolin is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin
Speaker details
Total words: 123.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510060.9% percentile
43.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos123.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.5%75.5%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 24.5%24.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.5%, sitewide 15.9%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 0.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos