Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Candi Martinez results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 93 hits. Analysis detected 354.008 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,350 of 28,364 speakers). This Candi Martinez is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group.
Candi Martinez
Speaker details
Total words: 123
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.4% percentile
26.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 51.4%51.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.1%30.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.9%35.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos