Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Canary Mission results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 86.7% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 285 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (7,938 of 28,364 speakers). This Canary Mission is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Canary Mission
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
52.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 86.7%86.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.3%43.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 56.7%56.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 43.3%43.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 86.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 56.7%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos