Speaker summary
⁠73%2 analyzed articles/videos232.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camila DeChalus results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 57.6% saturation with 148.278 hits. Analysis detected 1,170.14 faulty-reasoning hits from 232.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,707 of 28,364 speakers). This Camila DeChalus is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Camila DeChalus
Speaker details
Total words: 232.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.0% percentile
21.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos232.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 54.1%54.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 57.6%57.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 29.3%29.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 23.7%23.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 16.8%16.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 57.6%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 54.1%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 23.7%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos