Speaker summary
37%1 analyzed article/video87.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cameron Hudson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 228 faulty-reasoning hits from 87.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25.7% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,530 of 37,961 speakers). This Cameron Hudson is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Cameron Hudson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
44%Cameron Hudson (selected)26%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 87.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
25.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos87.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 27.0%27.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 27.0%27.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos