Speaker summary
⁠58%2 analyzed articles/videos67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These California Interagency Incident Management Team 8 results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 162 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 64.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,491 of 28,364 speakers). This California Interagency Incident Management Team 8 is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
California Interagency Incident Management Team 8
Speaker details
Total words: 67
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
64.5% BS Score2 analyzed videos67 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 46.7%46.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 46.7%46.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos