Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video72 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cal Poly results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 72 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,127 of 28,364 speakers). This Cal Poly is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Cal Poly
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 72
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos72 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Special Pleading: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos