Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cal Newport results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 137.611 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,369 of 28,364 speakers). This Cal Newport is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Cal Newport
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 66.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
31.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos66.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.0%55.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 42.3%42.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 42.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos