Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Doornbos results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 46.125 hits. Analysis detected 128.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,224 of 28,364 speakers). This Caitlin Doornbos is worse (more manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
Caitlin Doornbos
Speaker details
Total words: 61.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.5% percentile
58.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos