Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burnett Coburn results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Halo Effect, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.2% saturation with 28.131 hits. Analysis detected 94.131 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,109 of 28,364 speakers). This Burnett Coburn is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Burnett Coburn
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
26.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 55.2%55.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 19.1%19.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 55.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos