Speaker summary
ā 27%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Burgum results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 16 hits. Analysis detected 32 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ā 41% (16,823 of 28,364 speakers). This Burgum is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Burgum
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 41%Burgum (selected)25%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

41% percentile
025507510040.7% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 2.7%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos