Speaker summary
⁠54%3 analyzed articles/videos103.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bureau of Prisons results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 34.563 hits. Analysis detected 94.563 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (13,513 of 27,012 speakers). This Bureau of Prisons is worse (more manipulative) than 50.00% of the peer group.
Bureau of Prisons
Speaker details
Total words: 103.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.0% percentile
32.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos103.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.7%33.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 6.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos