Speaker summary
31%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Buckingham Palace results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 27.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.1% and a BS Rank of 39% (17,288 of 28,265 speakers). This Buckingham Palace is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Buckingham Palace
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.8% percentile
24.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 27.6%27.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.4%22.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 27.6%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos