Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Coughlan - Royal correspondents results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 232 hits. Analysis detected 830 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,898 of 6,366 authors). This Sean Coughlan - Royal correspondents is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Sean Coughlan - Royal correspondents
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
55%Sean Coughlan - Royal correspondents (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.1%2.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.0%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos