Speaker summary
⁠42%2 analyzed articles/videos35 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bubista results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.9% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 94 faulty-reasoning hits from 35 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 51.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,149 of 28,364 speakers). This Bubista is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Bubista
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 35
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
51.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos35 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.9%60.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 47.8%47.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 47.8%47.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 47.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos