Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video936 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eromo Egbejule results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 2,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,421 of 6,629 authors). This Eromo Egbejule is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Eromo Egbejule
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
49%Eromo Egbejule (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,744
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.5%7.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos