Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryn Mawr Film Institute results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Status Quo Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (8,491 of 28,364 speakers). This Bryn Mawr Film Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Bryn Mawr Film Institute
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510070.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos