Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bryan Bedford results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 66% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 262.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 45.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,831 of 28,364 speakers). This Bryan Bedford is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group.
Bryan Bedford
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.8% percentile
45.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 49.5%49.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 66.0%66.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 33.0%33.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 66.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 49.5%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos