Speaker summary
⁠71%2 analyzed articles/videos150.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bruce D. Brown results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 61.9% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 426.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 150.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 26% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,424 of 28,364 speakers). This Bruce D. Brown is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Bruce D. Brown
Speaker details
Total words: 150.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
26.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos150.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 62.0%62.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.1%41.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.6%18.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.6%14.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 62.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos