Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brown University’s Costs of War Project results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 56 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (559 of 28,364 speakers). This Brown University’s Costs of War Project is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Brown University’s Costs of War Project
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510098.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos28 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos