Speaker summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos109.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brien Hoo results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 143 faulty-reasoning hits from 109.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,554 of 28,364 speakers). This Brien Hoo is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
Brien Hoo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 109.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.1% percentile
19.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos109.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.7%21.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos