Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bridget Psarianos results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81.5% saturation with 78.247 hits. Analysis detected 251.247 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,298 of 28,364 speakers). This Bridget Psarianos is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Bridget Psarianos
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
42.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 81.5%81.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.0%37.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.0%37.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 81.5%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.0%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos