Speaker summary
⁠48%2 analyzed articles/videos194.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Briana Mathews results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 311.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 194.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,863 of 28,364 speakers). This Briana Mathews is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Briana Mathews
Speaker details
Total words: 194.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos194.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 24.0%24.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.2%14.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 24.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos