Speaker summary
99%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Garrett results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 219 hits. Analysis detected 1,485.397 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (7,202 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Garrett is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Brian Garrett
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
58.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 72.0%72.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 67.1%67.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 57.4%57.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 66.4%66.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.3%34.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 72.0%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 67.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 66.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 57.4%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 32.9%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos