Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Ashworth results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 78.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 87.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,912 of 28,364 speakers). This Brian Ashworth is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
Brian Ashworth
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
87.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 75.0%75.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos