Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brenda Hashtag results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Representativeness Heuristic, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 595 faulty-reasoning hits from 283 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (26,408 of 28,364 speakers). This Brenda Hashtag is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group.
Brenda Hashtag
Speaker details
Total words: 283
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.9% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos283 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 17.0%17.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 8.5%8.5%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.8%1.8%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Middle Ground: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos