Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Elisa Wouk Almino results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Halo Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 342 hits . Analysis detected 2,242 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Elisa Wouk Almino is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Elisa Wouk Almino
Author details
Total words: 3,244
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst