Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video49.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bree Nielson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 37.125 hits. Analysis detected 156.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 49.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,304 of 28,364 speakers). This Bree Nielson is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Bree Nielson
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠61%Bree Nielson (selected)43%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 49.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
42.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos49.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 75.0%75.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.3%30.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Halo Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos