Speaker summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video139 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandreth results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 695 faulty-reasoning hits from 139 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (525 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandreth is worse (more manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Brandreth
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 139
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

98% percentile
025507510098.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos139 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos