Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video107.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brandon Tatum results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 221.525 faulty-reasoning hits from 107.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,723 of 28,364 speakers). This Brandon Tatum is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Brandon Tatum
Speaker details
Total words: 107.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
30.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos107.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 58.6%58.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 41.3%41.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.3%24.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%In-Group Bias: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 7.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos